Studio Recording Engineer
 
    Login or Register
 :: 

 
 

Studio Recording Engineer -- View topic - To Master or not to master. This is the question.


Forum FAQ Search Memberlist Usergroups Profile Login to check your private messages Login

Studio Recording Engineer Forum Index -> Audio Mastering

To Master or not to master. This is the question.
Goto page Previous  1, 2
  Author    Thread Post new topic Reply to topic
wbiphoto
Wannabe
Wannabe


Joined: Jun 19, 2008
Posts: 3

"The perfect mix may need no mastering at all!!", Bob Katz, from his book Mastering Audio.

Bob knows a tiny bit about mastering and this quote is taken from his chapter on Equalization where he gets into lots of details about how to EQ to make the perfect mix.

Theoretically speaking, masternot is completely right. If a mix is perfectly mixed, whereby all of the instruments are sitting in their proper place, each having their own proper dynamic range in relation to other instruments, and each reaching that peak amplitude/gain, then what's the mastering engineer to do?

Granted, this is a theoretically perfect mix, one which rarely if ever occurs in the real world.

masternot, what you need to realize is that the bar has been raised(or perhaps lowered, depending on your side of the fence on the Loudness War) to a new level; and I mean that figuratively and literally. I'd guess that 99.99% of all recordings are mastered by applying the well-adhered to processes to stereo files or stereo songs on tape.

If you think your recordings can compete(and yes, it IS a competition) with others in the same genre without doing the masterig on the final stereo file, then my hat's off to you. You da man!

PS. I've just received the latest issue of Electronic Musician and Bob Katz is interviewed on this issue. He says: "the better the mix the less work the mastering engineer has to do." Adding more credence to masternot's position.

Post Fri Jun 20, 2008 6:25 am 
 View users profile Send private message  Reply with quote  
masteringhouse
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: May 28, 2005
Posts: 65
Location: Pennsylvania, USA

Let's not forget that mastering is about making an album sound it's best, not just a track.

One can have the "perfect" mix that requires little to no processing, as you add more tracks to an album and each need to have a certain consistency of sound in relation to the others, the odds in not needing mastering go down.

I often use the analogy that when recording it's difficult to determine what the overall level and quality a track should be until it's in the mix. Likewise it's difficult to determine what the level and overall quality of a stereo mix should be until you've heard it against others in the album.

Each phase of audio production has it's purpose and shouldn't be ignored.
_________________
Tom Volpicelli
The Mastering House Inc.
http://www.masteringhouse.com
CD Mastering and Media Production Services

Post Sun Jun 22, 2008 5:02 pm 
 View users profile Send private message Visit posters website  Reply with quote  
  Display posts from previous:      
Post new topic Reply to topic

Jump to:  

Goto page Previous  1, 2

Last Thread | Next Thread  >


Forum Rules:
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 
Add Links | Studio Webmasters | Contact Us | Downloads | Amazon
Search | Tips | Recommend | Account | PM | MB | Sound Engineering | Web Design

Studio Recording Engineer © 2004 -2008 Studio Recording Engineer



Disipal Design